ERCOT·WATCH Search ercot.com  ⌕
PGRR #144 · Revision Request

PGRR144  Dynamic Model Submission and Review Requirements for Large Loads including Large Computational Loads

Pending sponsor ERCOT posted 2026-02-18 next ROS for Impact Analysis consideration (ROS) ercot.com
ReasonGeneral system and/or process improvement(s)
Created2026-03-05
Sections Affected
6.29.2.19.2.1.1 (new)9.3.4.3and 9.6
Summary
This Planning Guide Revision Request (PGRR) clarifies requirements for submitting dynamic model data for Large Loads to ensure accurate representation of each Large Load in ERCOT’s models. The PGRR requires submission of this data using formats compatible with the software platforms described in the Dynamics Working Group Procedure Manual (i.e., PSS/E, PSCAD, and TSAT). This PGRR also requires model quality tests demonstrating voltage ride-through capability for all Large Loads and converter model validation reports benchmarking PSCAD models against actual hardware tests for all Large Computational Loads (LCLs), ensuring high-quality and accurate models. In addition, this PGRR clarifies that material changes to an LCL that could impact ride-through capability must be reviewed through the Large Load Interconnection Study (LLIS) process before implementing the change. Furthermore, the PGRR clarifies that an Interconnecting Large Load Entity (ILLE) must meet the dynamic data submission requirements before initiating a dynamic stability study. The same dynamic data submission requirements are applicable whenever dynamic data is required to be submitted in accordance with the prerequisites specified in the current paragraph (5) of Section 5.3.5, Quarterly Stability Assessment. Finally, the PGRR requires the ILLE to submit updated dynamic models for the “as-built” LCL facility prior to requesting Initial Energization along with documentation identifying any differences from previously submitted model data used in the ERCOT quarterly stability assessment (“QSA”) and an attestation that the as-built data reflect the actual field settings.
Action Log 2 milestones
Amendments
DateBodyMotionResult
Jul 9 '26ROS To recommend approval of PGRR144 as amended by the 6/11/26 ERCOT commentsPassed
Ballots
DateBodyResultYesNoAbstain
Jul 9 '26 ROS Motion Carries 6 0 8 xls
Mar 5 '26 ROS Motion Carries 7.5 0 0 xls
Documents 13
NameTypePostedClassification
144PGRR-01 Dynamic Model Submission and Review Requirements for Large Loads including Large Electronic Loads 021826 docx Feb 18 '26 Revision Request
144PGRR-02 Impact Analysis 021826 docx Feb 18 '26 Staff Report
144PGRR-03 Hut 8 Comments 030326 docx Mar 3 '26 Revision Request Comments
144PGRR-04 ROS Ballot 030526 xls Mar 9 '26 Revision Request Ballot
144PGRR-05 ROS Report 030526 docx Mar 9 '26 Committee Report
144PGRR-06 Schaper Energy Consulting Comments 031326 docx Mar 13 '26 Revision Request Comments
144PGRR-07 Data Center Coalition Comments 033026 docx Mar 30 '26 Revision Request Comments
144PGRR-08 ERCOT Comments 040826 docx Apr 8 '26 Revision Request Comments
144PGRR-09 ERCOT Comments 050526 docx May 5 '26 Revision Request Comments
144PGRR-10 DCC Comments 060526 docx Jun 5 '26 Revision Request Comments
144PGRR-11 ERCOT Comments 061126 docx Jun 11 '26 Revision Request Comments
144PGRR-12 ROS Ballot 070926 xls Jul 11 '26 Revision Request Ballot
144PGRR-13 ROS Report 070926 docx Jul 11 '26 Committee Report
Meetings That Took It Up 11
DateMeetingCommitteeStatus
Jul 9 '26 ROS Meeting - Webex Only ROS Concluded
Jun 25 '26 DWG Meeting - Webex Only DWG Concluded
Jun 19 '26 LLWG Meeting LLWG Concluded
Jun 4 '26 ROS Meeting ROS Concluded
May 21 '26 LLWG Meeting LLWG Concluded
May 7 '26 ROS Meeting ROS Concluded
Apr 24 '26 LLWG Meeting LLWG Concluded
Apr 16 '26 DWG Meeting - Webex Only DWG Concluded
Apr 2 '26 ROS Meeting ROS Concluded
Mar 13 '26 LLWG Meeting LLWG Concluded
Mar 5 '26 ROS Meeting ROS Concluded