NPRR #659 · Revision Request
NPRR659 Discontinue RMR Cost Data Deviation Requests/Responses Report
ReasonMeets strategic goals Market efficiencies or enhancements Other: In recent history (the Nodal market and the latter years of the Zonal market) it has not been necessary to create this report for any of the Reliability Must-Run (RMR) Units. While the report may provide some incentive for timely submission of actual cost, ultimately there is a stronger incentive to have actual cost submitted according to the deadlines due to the Protocol requirement to substitute missing actuals costs with a zero value.
Created2014-10-09
Approved2015-02-10
Sections Affected
3.14.1.123.14.1.16
Summary
This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) proposes the discontinuation of the posting requirement for Reliability Must Run Cost Data Deviation Requests/Responses, ERCOT Market Information List (EMIL) ID, NP3-558-M. This NPRR is part of a series of revision requests submitted by the Market Information System User Group (MISUG) in support of the TAC June 2013 recommendation that all manually developed ERCOT market reports be reviewed for market interest and the amount of labor involved to produce the reports. This NPRR is the result of a collaborative effort between the MISUG and ERCOT to review the reports that are manually produced by ERCOT. Below is the MISUG summary of the results of the review: · Evaluated the 134 reports manually produced by ERCOT Staff · 95 reports are required by Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) Substantive Rules, ERCOT Protocols or an ERCOT Other Binding Document. · 39 reports are requested or self prompted. · Conclusion of the evaluation: · Discontinue 15 reports, eliminating 516 hrs of manual work annually. · Continue producing 119 reports which constitute 24,631.5 hours of manual work annually.Automate 15 reports which would eliminate 3,906 hours of manual work annually.
Action Log 5 milestones
-
Oct 9
PRSDeferred/Tabled→ PRS for consideration
-
Nov 6
PRSRecommended for Approval→ PRS for Impact Analysis review.
-
Dec 11
PRSRecommended for Approval→ TAC for consideration
-
Dec 18
TACRecommended for Approval→ Board for consideration
-
Feb 10
BOARDApproved
Amendments
| Date | Body | Motion | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 '14 | PRS | To recommend approval of NPRR659 as amended by the 10/30/14 ROS comments. | Passed |
| Dec 11 '14 | PRS | To endorse and forward to TAC the 11/6/14 PRS Report as amended by the 12/10/14 ERCOT comments and the Impact Analysis for NPRR659. | Passed |
Documents 10
| Name | Type | Posted | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|
| 659NPRR-01 Discontinue RMR Cost Data Deviation Requests Response | doc | Sep 24 '14 | Revision Request |
| 659NPRR-02 PRS Report 100914 | doc | Oct 9 '14 | Committee Report |
| 659NPRR-03 WMS Comments 103014 | doc | Oct 30 '14 | Revision Request Comments |
| 659NPRR-04 ROS Comments 103014 | doc | Oct 30 '14 | Revision Request Comments |
| 659NPRR-05 PRS Report 110614 | doc | Nov 11 '14 | Committee Report |
| 659NPRR-06 Impact Analysis 120414 | doc | Dec 4 '14 | Staff Report |
| 659NPRR-07 ERCOT Comments 121014 | doc | Dec 10 '14 | Revision Request Comments |
| 659NPRR-08 PRS Report 121114 | doc | Dec 12 '14 | Committee Report |
| 659NPRR-09 TAC Report 121814 | doc | Dec 19 '14 | Committee Report |
| 659NPRR-10 Board Report 021015 | doc | Feb 16 '15 | Committee Report |
Meetings That Took It Up 8
| Date | Meeting | Committee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9 '15 | Board of Directors Meeting | BOARD | Concluded |
| Dec 18 '14 | TAC Meeting | TAC | Concluded |
| Dec 11 '14 | PRS Meeting | PRS | Concluded |
| Nov 12 '14 | Joint CWG/MCWG Meeting | CREDITWG | Concluded |
| Nov 6 '14 | PRS Meeting | PRS | Concluded |
| Oct 30 '14 | ROS Meeting | ROS | Concluded |
| Oct 29 '14 | WMS Meeting | WMS | Concluded |
| Oct 9 '14 | PRS Meeting | PRS | Concluded |