Meeting · QMWG

QSE Managers Working Group Meeting

Concluded date 2010-08-10 time 09:30–15:30 ercot.com

LocationERCOT Austin 8000 Metropolis (Building E), Suite 100 Austin, TX 78744 Room 168

Revision Requests On The Agenda

NPRR256PRR787

Agenda 7 items

1. Antitrust Admonition ERCOT strictly prohibits market participants and their employees who are participating in ERCOT activities from using their participation in ERCOT activities as a forum for engaging in practices or communications that violate the antitrust laws. The ERCOT Board has approved guidelines for members of ERCOT Committees, subcommittees and working Groups to be reviewed and followed by each market participant attending ERCOT meetings. — All · 9:30 a.m.
2. WMS assignment review and agenda review. — D. Detelich · 9:35 a.m.
3.
ERCOT Operations Issues I. Ancillary Services Methodology Status II. Status of WGR MET data and RTPP data III. Update on AWS Truewind workshop request — ERCOT · 9:40 p.m.
- as_workshop_followup_questions (TPS edits) · Revision Request Comments
- Raw Wind Power Forecast Data for August '10 QMWG Meeting (July ' · Staff Report
4. GREDP Calculations and other Nodal Reliability Performance Metrics Review I. Review answers provided by ERCOT to submitted questions II. Methodology ERCOT will be using to group LaaR resources into Group A and B on a daily basis III. Ramp rate used for SCED control clarification a. Time for MIS entered values to take effect IV. GREDP and BPD differences a. Effect of using ABP and ARI over 5 minutes for GREDP and AABP over 15 minutes for BPD (should failures and charges coincide?) b. Examples from Market Participants LFC test results and settlement V. Propose actions a. Identify revisions required b. Propose a grace period VI. Assignments — D. Detelich/ S. Looney/ ERCOT · 10:05 a.m.
5. NPRR256, Synchronize Nodal Protocols with PRR787, Add Non-Compliance Language to QSE Performance Standards (formerly "Add Violation Language to QSE Performance Standards") — R Stephenson · 1:00 p.m.
6. IRR Base Point deviation I. Verify that the settlement charge is built using the HSL from the COP II. Examples or LFC test settlements from Market Participants showing the effect of this design a. A charges present when price is positive and base point matched the telemetered HSL? b. Did WGR pass GREDP metric for same interval III. Revision proposals — D. Detelich/ · 2:30 p.m.
7. Action item review and future meetings — D. Detelich · 3:20 p.m.